In the past it was easy to determine a part was done by ATL or AFP. Easy parts were mainly done by Automatic Tape Laying ATL, complex ones were typically done by Automatic Fiber Placement AFP. Today, it is needed to determine the right business case for each part based on scrap ratio, productivity, and feasibility. This presentation will define 2-3 business cases examples justifying the final machine selection architecture and technology, focusing on latest, MTorres Tape Laying technology called V3 ATL head. Due to the increase in speed, and lower acquisition price of ATL vs AFP, the new head is bringing new life into the ATL world.